The Core of the Problem: Why Students Are Worried and Unsatisfied

Students fear that their hard work is not being accurately evaluated due to systemic flaws in the checking process. The main complaints include:

1. Inconsistent and Unfair Marking: This is the biggest issue. Two examiners can give wildly different scores for the same answer sheet. It often feels like a “lottery” depending on which examiner gets your paper.
2. Mismanagement and Errors: Incorrect tallying of marks, missing answers not being seen, and simple arithmetic mistakes are frequent.
3. Unqualified or Overburdened Examiners: Examiners are often college or school teachers who may not be subject-matter experts. They are also paid per paper, leading to a rush to check more papers quickly, sacrificing quality for quantity.
4. Subjectivity in Subjective Papers: In subjects like English, Urdu, Islamiyat, and Pakistan Studies, the marking criteria can be highly subjective. An examiner’s personal bias or mood can significantly impact scores.
5. Lack of Transparency: The process is opaque. Students have no way of knowing how their paper was checked or why marks were deducted.
6. The “Re-checking” Scam: Many students believe the official re-checking process is merely a re-counting of marks and not an actual re-evaluation of answers. They pay a fee but see no change in their marks, leading to further frustration and distrust.

The Official Channel for Redressal: Rechecking/Re-counting

If a student is unsatisfied with their results, the BISE provides a mechanism to apply for a review. It’s crucial to understand the types:

1. Re-counting (Double-Checking of Totals):
   • What it is: The board staff will add up the marks on each page of your answer booklet again to ensure no mathematical error was made.
   • What it IS NOT: They do not re-read your answers. They only verify the total.
   • Chances of Change: Low. It only catches addition mistakes.
2. Re-evaluation (Re-checking of Answers):
   • What it is: Your paper is sent to a different examiner for a fresh evaluation. The new examiner checks each answer and assigns marks without knowing the original score.
   • What it IS NOT: You cannot see the paper or argue your case. It’s a blind re-check.
   • Chances of Change: Higher than re-counting, but still not guaranteed. The result can go up, down, or stay the same. If you apply for this, you must accept the new marks, even if they are lower.
3. Scrutiny (Photocopy of Answer Script):
   • Some boards allow you to apply for a photocopy of your answer sheet first. This is the most valuable step.
   • Why it’s important: You can physically see where marks were deducted. You can then make an informed decision about whether to apply for re-evaluation. If you see a whole unanswered question was marked, for example, you have a very strong case.

Step-by-Step Guide for a Worried Student

If you are unsatisfied, you must act quickly. There is a short deadline (usually 15-30 days after the result is announced).

1. Gather Information: Collect your Roll Number, Registration Card, and a copy of your result card.
2. Check Your Board’s Website: Go to the official website of your specific BISE (e.g., BISE Lahore, BISE Gujranwala, etc.). Look for the “Result Inquiry” or “Rechecking” section.
3. Understand the Options & Fees: See what services are offered (Re-counting, Re-evaluation, Scrutiny/Copy) and what the fee is for each subject. Fees are typically a few hundred rupees per subject per service.
4. Apply Online: All boards now have an online application system. You will need to:
   • Create an account/log in.
   • Enter your details and roll number.
   • Select the subject(s) you want to have rechecked.
   • Choose the service (Re-counting, Re-evaluation).
   • Pay the fee via bank challan or online payment.
5. Keep Records: Save the payment receipt and a screenshot of the application confirmation. Note down any tracking number provided.
6. Wait for the Outcome: The process can take several weeks. The revised result (if any) will be updated on the board’s website. You will usually be notified via SMS.

Beyond the Individual: Systemic Issues and Advocacy

The problem is bigger than any one student. True change requires systemic reform:

• Better Training for Examiners: Standardized training and clear marking schemes are essential.
• Digital Assessment: Some boards are piloting digital checking where answer sheets are scanned. This can help anonymize papers and distribute them more fairly among examiners.
• Accountability: Examiners whose marking shows consistent bias or errors should be held accountable.
• Transparency: The process needs to be more open. Allowing students to see their marked copies should be a standard right.

Conclusion:

Your worry is valid. The system is far from perfect. The best practical advice is to first apply for a photocopy of your answer sheet (Scrutiny) if your board allows it. This will give you concrete evidence before you spend more money on a re-evaluation.